In its ruling 2204/2024, the Supreme Administrative Court did not accept the Finnish Tax Administration’s approach to claim, in the conversion of a Finnish entity from a full-fledged operator to a service provider, that the transfer of something of value should have been compensated for without the identification of the “something”. The Finnish Tax Administration’s reassessment, which comprised the difference between the estimated values of the Finnish business before and after the restructuring, was overturned.