Implementing Key BEPS Actions: Where do we stand?

Implementing Key BEPS Actions: Where Do We Stand?
This book explores the various ways in which 36 countries from across the globe have implemented the key proposals emerging from the BEPS Project.

Why this book?

In recent times, countries have increasingly shifted their focus towards the curbing of tax avoidance and abuse. Accordingly, the G20 countries commissioned the OECD to undertake the BEPS Project, following which the OECD released its Final Reports on 15 distinct Actions in 2015. Further, the OECD also released the Multilateral Instrument, a multilateral tax treaty through which the application of thousands of bilateral tax treaties may be modified as regards the tax treaty-related proposals stemming from the BEPS Project.

Presently, while several countries have already implemented large portions of these proposals, others have only implemented them to a limited extent. This may be due to several reasons, such as lack of relevance or administrative capacity, or differing policy priorities. However, as the Inclusive Framework is in the process of peer reviewing the compliance of each member with the minimum standards, more and more countries are implementing at least these minimum standards. Significantly, the BEPS Project has also given rise to new multilateral measures such as the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, which has led to a minimum level of harmonization in the European Union regarding some of the BEPS measures.

This book explores the various ways in which countries have implemented the key proposals emerging from the BEPS Project. Through contributions made by national reporters from 36 different countries – including developed, developing and emerging economies – the book constitutes an expert guide to the varied perspectives towards the BEPS Project across the globe. While discussing the implementation of the BEPS Project, this study provides an in-depth analysis of the obstacles faced by countries in the implementation phase of the BEPS Project, as well as the interaction of such measures with various domestic legal systems.

Downloads

Sample excerpt, including table of contents

This book is part of the WU Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law – Tax Law and Policy Series.

View other titles in the series 

Editor(s)

Michael Lang, Jeffrey Owens, Pasquale Pistone, Alexander Rust, Josef Schuch and Claus Staringer are professors at the Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business).

Assistant Editor(s)

Sriram Govind, Andreas Langer and Christina Dimitropoulou are PhD candidates at the Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, WU (Vienna University of Economics and Business).

Contributor(s)

Kristiina Äimä, Muhammad Ashfaq Ahmed, Desiree Auer, Tomáš Balco, Rahul Batheja, B. Bawono Kristiaji, Jakob Bundgaard, Simon Busch, David Domínguez, David G. Duff, Marilena Ene, Stjepan Gadžo, Ricardo André Galendi Júnior, Malcolm Gammie, Cristián Garate, Elizabeth Gil García, Sriram Govind, Akiko Hamada, Sigrid Hemels, Peter Hongler, Tracy A. Kaye, Patrick Knörzer, Peter Koerver Schmidt, Svetislav V. Kostić, Jiří Kostohryz, Milada Kuceková, Andreas Langer, Krzysztof Lasiński-Sulecki, Na Li, Gaspar Lopes Dias V.S., Henri Lyyski, Jorge Martín López, Luis Maria Méndez, Clement Okello Migai, Marco Mosconi, A. Selçuk Özgenç Pasquale Pistone, Alice Pirlot, Ewa Prejs, Natalia Quiñones, Adrian Sawyer, Luís Eduardo Schoueri, Mirna Solange Screpante, Andrew Smith, C. John Taylor, Edoardo Traversa, Denny Vissaro, Martin Wenz, Björn Westberg, Felipe Yáñez, Priscilla Zamora, Lidija Živković, Yansheng Zhu, Nataša Žunić Kovačević.

Implementing Key BEPS Actions: Where Do We Stand?
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm
Chapter 1: General Report
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm001
Chapter 2: Argentina
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm002
Chapter 3: Australia
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm003
Chapter 4: Austria
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm004
Chapter 5: Belgium
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm005
Chapter 6: Brazil
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm006
Chapter 7: Canada
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm007
Chapter 8: Chile
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm008
Chapter 9: China
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm009
Chapter 10: Colombia
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm010
Chapter 11: Costa Rica
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm011
Chapter 12: Croatia
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm012
Chapter 13: Czech Republic
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm013
Chapter 14: Denmark
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm014
Chapter 15: Finland
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm015
Chapter 16: India
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm016
Chapter 17: Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm017
Chapter 18: Italy
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm018
Chapter 19: Japan
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm019
Chapter 20: Kenya
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm020
Chapter 21: Liechtenstein
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm021
Chapter 22: Luxembourg
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm022
Chapter 23: Mexico
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm023
Chapter 24: Netherlands
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm024
Chapter 25: New Zealand
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm025
Chapter 26: Pakistan
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm026
Chapter 27: Poland
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm027
Chapter 28: Romania
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm028
Chapter 29: Serbia
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm029
Chapter 30: Singapore
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm030
Chapter 31: Slovak Republic
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm031
Chapter 32: Spain
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm032
Chapter 33: Sweden
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm033
Chapter 34: Switzerland
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm034
Chapter 35: Turkey
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm035
Chapter 36: United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm036
Chapter 37: United States
https://doi.org/10.59403/27ze1gm037