Effectiveness of the Beneficial Ownership Test in Conduit Company Cases
Effectiveness of the Beneficial Ownership Test in Conduit Company Cases
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 1: Introduction
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 2: Confusions of the Legalistic Approach
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 3: Substance Based Approach
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 4: Substantive Business Activity
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 5: Dominion
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 6: The Step Transaction Doctrine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Chapter 7: Conclusion
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
Appendix: Translations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
References
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3tx6k12
Go to Tax Research Platform
A critique of the policy behind the beneficial ownership test as a countermeasure against cases of improper use of double tax treaties.
Why This Book?
Since the introduction of the term “beneficial owner” to the OECD Model Tax Convention in 1977, courts and the OECD have struggled to interpret the term, and to use it as a test for deciding conduit company cases.
If applied in a formal legalistic sense, the beneficial ownership test has no effect on conduit companies because companies are legal persons that, in law, own both their assets and their income beneficially. By contrast, in a substantive sense, a company can never own anything because economically a company is no more than a matrix of arrangements that represents individuals who act through it.
Faced with these opposing considerations, courts and the OECD have adopted surrogate tests for the beneficial ownership test. These tests, however, were originally meant to counter different kinds of tax planning strategies. They did not indicate the presence of beneficial ownership. Therefore, they are inappropriate for determining the correct tax treatment of passive income derived by conduit companies.
This book examines the conflict between the general policy of double tax treaties embodied in the beneficial ownership requirement and the concept of corporations. The work highlights the shortcomings of surrogate tests with the help of analyses of reported conduit company cases. It offers an alternative approach for interpreting and applying the beneficial ownership test. It contains a critique of the work of the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs before the insertion of the term, and suggests appropriate amendments to relevant parts of the official Commentary on the OECD Model Tax Convention.
Special offer
- Order the print together with any electronic format of the same title and receive a 20% discount on each format. The discount is calculated automatically in your shopping cart.
- Bulk discounts apply on orders of 10 or more books of the same format (this applies to each of the formats) with a maximum of 20% discount. The offer is not valid for resellers.
- Students are entitled to a 50% discount on IBFD books and 20% discount on third party books (valid student card required).
To obtain student discounts, contact Customer Support.
Online books
Access your online books on the Tax Research Platform.
Don’t have a Tax Research Platform subscription?
Learn more