European sovereign wealth funds... A target for the future?

Recently, French President Sarkozy, who holds the rotating presidency of the European Council, suggested that the European Parliament consider creating “sovereign wealth funds “ within the European Union as a response to the financial and economic turmoil. The main target seems to be protecting Europe’s strategic sectors (such as defence, energy or banking) by injecting cash into the struggling companies. “I don’t want European citizens to wake up in a few months and discover that European companies belong to non-European capitals,” he said. Moreover, according to Sarkozy, these funds could access cheap finance and sell back industrial stakes in the market at a later profit.

 Commission President Manuel Barrosso called the idea “extremely interesting”, provided that its main target remains to protect the European Citizens and that it does not infringe the EC rules (State aide and competition rules). Conversely, Germany reacted coldly to the proposal, suspecting its progenitor to hide protectionist targets such as helping French small companies squeezed by the credit crunch and protect French firms from unwanted takeovers.  The German Economics minister merely dismissed the project, describing it as “against the successful principles of our economic policy”.

Do you think that Sarkozy’s plan is in line with the ideas of other European nations? If not, what ideas would you suggest or how would you modify Sarkozy’s plan? Is this disguised state aid that benefits certain nations or simply governments acting in a time of crisis to prevent Europe’s economic collapse?

 

Comments (3)
gg
Comment: Drastic times call for drastic measures? The real worry is that the non-European capitals may be in worse final straits in the coming years than the European ones are now. Ineffective financial regulation extends far beyond derivative instruments and credit default swaps in many countries and it may take much longer for those problems to reveal themselves.

Europe needs ruthless short term solutions right now to protect the foundation of their economies. However, long term socialism and pots of government bail out money will lead to a lazy and uninspired industry and commerce. Watch how the US automotive industry continues to take taxpayer money without accepting the need to change their overall strategy. Do what needs to be done, tie off the limb so to say, but create a long term strategy that won't leave the government as a self-destructive crutch to our "strategic sectors."

November 07 02:46 PM
René Offermanns
Comment: In difficult times extraordinary measures should be taken. I expect that the Netherlands would be in favour of the French plan in particular because the takeover of ABN AMRO by three other European banks received already a lot of criticism. Therefore, I expect that the Dutch government will support measures that prevent that capital will go to non-European capitals if those are applied by all Member States. However, to realize that the capital supply is spend effectively, the Sarkozy plan should be combined with an suggestion made last week by the future US president Obama who indicated that companies could obtain a capital supply if they switch to an innovative strategy contributing to growth, welfare and environment.
November 12 02:33 PM
Konstantin
Comment: Hm, why does everything coming from France smell like socialism... It is enough to remember how inefficiant has the EU common agricultural policy proven to be. This is simply because the EU bureaucratic machine cannot possibly move fast enough to react to market turbulences (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4407792.stm#mountain). Anyway, I think I read the topic thoroughly, but could not locate the tax aspects of Sarcozy's plan. The only potential tax aspect might be that "these funds could access cheap finance", probably including some tax advantages for investing in the "sovereign" funds. That very much resembles the (again French) indirect fiscal aid case Fonds industriel de modernisation Case 102/87 (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=en&numdoc=61987J0102). So according to me it WILL be indirect state aid.
November 13 11:00 AM
Leave Your Comment
Mandatory
Optional
Optional
HTML Syntax: Allowed